Radha Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.45958 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -24 Year- 2017 Thana -KAJRAULICHAK District- BHAGALPUR ====================================================== Radha Devi, Wife of Mito Yadav, resident of Gaurachauki, P.S.- Kajraili, District- Bhagalpur.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, Avocate For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Anusuiya Jaiswal, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 08-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in Kajraili P.S. Case No. 24 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 364/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
It has been submitted that petitioner is a lady and there is no allegation of any specific overt act against her. The other co-accused persons with similar allegation have already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 03.11.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. 44995 of 2017. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Kajraili P.S. Case No. 24
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45958 of 2017 (3) dt.08-11-2017 2/2 of 2017, she shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-XIV, Bhagalpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T