Patna High CourtCR. MISC./66318/2024allowed

Monu Kumar @ Likich @ Monu v. The State Of Bihar

2024-10-26Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66318 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-64 Year-2024 Thana- DELHA District- Gaya ====================================================== Monu Kumar @ Likich @ Monu Son of Ashok Ram @ Ashok Paswan Resident of Village- Banglasthan, Pahsi, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 59893 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-64 Year-2024 Thana- DELHA District- Gaya ====================================================== Sahil Kumar @ Sahil Paswan Son of Late Jitendra Paswan Resident of Village - Bangla Asthan Pahsi, Police Station - Kotwali, District - Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 66318 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jitendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Naresh Ray (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 59893 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Aryan Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Surendra Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 26-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners have prayed for grant of bail in connection with Delha P.S. Case No. 64 of 2024 registered under sections 447, 427, 307, 386, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 27, 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66318 of 2024(3) dt.26-10-2024 2/3 Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that petitioners along with others came at the house of the informant and started firing on his house. It is further alleged that they demanded extortion money and threatended him of dire consequences.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. They have falsely been implicated in this case due to ulterior motives. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that extortion demand has not been executed and also nobody has sustained any injury in this alleged offence. It is further submitted in respect of petitioner, namely, Sahil Kumar who was already injured and he was admitted in IGIMS, Patna, so the allegation against him is not corroborated with the prosecution story. Moreover, the petitioners are languishing in judicial custody since 15.03.2024.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submitted that petitioners have criminal antecedent.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66318 of 2024(3) dt.26-10-2024 3/3 petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Delha P.S. Case No. 64 of 2024 on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-IV, Gaya.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) shubham/- U T