← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./69618/2024dismissed

Nawal Kumar Paswan @ Nawal Paswan @ Nawal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-10-17Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69618 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-45 Year-2024 Thana- Singhaul District- Begusarai ====================================================== Nawal Kumar Paswan @ Nawal Paswan @ Nawal Kumar S/o- Ramanandan Paswan Village- Sighaul W.No-01, Ps- Singhaul Dist- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Braj Bhusan Poddar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Naresh Ray, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 17-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Singhaul P.S. Case No.45 of 2024, registered for the offence punishable u/s 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 504 of the IPC. 3.

Allegedly, the petitioner is said to have assaulted the informant with the butt of pistol.

4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. No such occurrence in the manner as alleged has ever taken place. There is a case and counter-case between the parties and in the alleged occurrence, both sides have sustained injury. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69618 of 2024(2) dt.17-10-2024 2/2 5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail by submitting that there is specific allegation against the petitioner and the injury of the injured was found grievous in nature, which is clear from the impugned order.

6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the nature of injury, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on his behalf is hereby rejected.

7.

This application is accordingly dismissed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T