Patna High CourtCR. WJC/611/2016dismissed

Mukhia Imran Sabir @ Md. Imran Sabir v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2016-08-04Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.611 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -null Year- null Thana -null District- ARRARIA =========================================================== Mukhia Imran Sabir @ Md. Imran Sabir, son of Safiruddin, Panchayat Gairki Masuriya, Block Jokihat, permanent resident of village Bageshwari, Police Station Jokihat, district Araria .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Amit Kumar Aman, Block Development Officer, Jokihat, District Araria .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Durgesh Nandan, A.P.P. For original complainant : Mr. Md. Naushaduzzoha, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 04-08-2016 Heard learned Counsel for the parties concerned. This application has been filed for quashing of the First Information Report of Jokihat Police Station Case No. 326 of 2015, disclosing offences under Sections, 467, 468, 471, 420, 409 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that even if the allegations, as contained in the First Information Report, are taken to be true, no cognizable offence can be said to be made out against the petitioner. However, it appears that the petitioner had approached this Court for grant of anticipatory bail, which came to be rejected by an order, dated 11.04.2016, considering,

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.611 of 2016 dt.04-08-2016 2/2 inter alia, nature of allegation made in the First Information Report.

Since, while considering his application for anticipatory bail, a Bench of this Court found that the allegations contained in the First Information Report were such that the petitioner could not be granted privilege of anticipatory bail, in my opinion, this Court would not be justified to entertain the submission that no offence is made out on the basis of the allegations made in the First Information Report. This application is accordingly dismissed.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.) Prabhakar Anand/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 10.08.2016 Transmission Date 10.08.2016