Dhruv Prasad @ Drup Sah @ Dhruv Sah And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50021 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -102 Year- 2017 Thana -UCHAKAGAON District- GOPALGANJ ======================================================

1. Dhruv Prasad @ Drup Sah @ Dhruv Sah, Son of Raj Kumar Prasad @ Raj Kumar Sah,

2. Jyoti Kumar @ Jyotish Kumar, S/o Raj Kumar Prasad @ Raj Kumar Sah,

3. Rashmi Kumari @ Resham Kumari @ Reshami Kumari, D/o Raj Kumar Prasad @ Raj Kumar Sah,

4. Nitu Devi, W/o Dhruv Prasad @ Drup Sah, All are R/o Village- Pidra, P.S.- Uchakagaon, District- Gopalganj. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Krishna Prasad S/o Late Haridwar Prasad, R/o Village- Mirganj, P.S.- Mirganj, District- Gopalganj.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anirudh Kumar Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 31-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Uchakagaon P.S. Case No. 102 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that petitioners are brother-inlaw (Bhainsur), Dewar, unmarried Nanad and Gotni of the victim lady.

From the written report, there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50021 of 2017 (3) dt.31-10-2017 2/2 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Uchakagaon P.S. Case No. 102 of 2017, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IX, Gopalganj, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned,

(2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T