Chintu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49805 of 2017 (2) dt.18-10-2017 1/2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 49805 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -175 Year- 2017 Thana -MADANPURA District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Chintu Kumar, Son of Late Ajay Singh, resident of village - Anjan, P.S. - Madanpur, District Aurangabad (Bihar) .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Birendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 18-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code.
The petitioner is a PDS dealer. The dealership was allotted to the petitioner on compassionate ground. Allegation is that though the petitioner was a minor on the date of allotment of PDS dealership, he falsely has stated his age as 18 years. Considering the nature of allegation, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49805 of 2017 (2) dt.18-10-2017 2/2 like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Madanpur Police Station Case No. 175 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as condition that the petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation and trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. (Birendra Kumar, J) Kundan/- U T