Ashish Tanti v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72290 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2010 Thana- KHAIRA District- Jamui ====================================================== ASHISH TANTI SON OF RADHE TANTI R/O VILLAGE- JAMUNIPAR, P.S.- KHAIRA, DISTRICT- JAMUI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Mala Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ramesh Chandra, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 13-05-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State through virtual Court proceedings. Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks after complete start of the physical Court. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that police after investigation submitted charge-sheet under Sections 393 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 15.03.2021, charge-sheet has been submitted and has antecedent of five cases.

The informant alleges that three unknown criminals intercepted him and his companion and looted Rs.10,000/-, mobile and motorcycle of the informant.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that FIR was against unknown and name of this petitioner transpired in the further

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72290 of 2021(2) dt.13-05-2022 2/2 statement of the informant which was recorded on 16.01.2021 at para 245 of the case diary wherein the informant stated that he learnt confidentially that the petitioner and one Lukman Ansari and his unknown friend had committed this occurrence. Learned counsel further submits that it absolutely does not stand to reason that why the informant after more than eleven years of the occurrence disclosed the name of the petitioner which creates suspicion. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

Considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 15.03.2021, charge-sheet has been submitted and taking into consideration the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Khaira P.S. Case No. 181 of 2010, subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be the father Radhe Tanti.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T