Ranjit Bind @ Ranjeet Kumar @ Nepali Jee v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63604 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-34 Year-2021 Thana- JEHANABAD RAIL P.S. District- Gaya ====================================================== RANJIT BIND @ RANJEET KUMAR @ NEPALI JEE Son of Munna Bind R/o Bairam Chak, Nadaul, P.S. - Masaurhi, Distt. - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shambhu Sharan Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dilip Kumar No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 10-10-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 395, 397, 412 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, some unknown miscreants stopped the Train No. 08623 between Bela and Nadaul Station and entered into the Train and snatched the mobile phones of the passengers and also beaten them with bricks and stones.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and the same has been lodged against unknown persons. The name of the petitioner has come into light, on the basis of confessional

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63604 of 2023(2) dt.10-10-2023 2/2 statement of co-accused, which has got no evidentiary value in the eyes of law. Nothing incriminating/looted articles have been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. No T.I. Parade has been done. He further submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. He is languishing in judicial custody since 30.05.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Railway Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Jehanabad Rail P.S. Case No. 34 of 2021. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Arish/- U T