Shanti Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.927 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-322 Year-2018 Thana- JAHANABAD District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Shanti Devi Meghu Das @ Bigu Das Village- Ramgarh ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Rama Kant Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Sri Rana Randhir Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P.
The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Jehanabad P.S.Case No. 322 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation as per F.I.R. against the petitioner, who happens to be the mother -in-law of the deceased is that the petitioner and other family members always abused and assaulted her regularly and ultimately they killed her. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and the co-accused/husband of the deceased is in jail custody rather the allegation is general and omnibus in nature and the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.927 of 2019(3) dt.20-02-2019 2/2 petitioner has no criminal antecedent.
Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks from the date of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- ( Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Jehanabad P.S.Case No. 322 of 2018 to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-1, Jehanabad, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438 ( 2) Cr.P.C. with other that bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudha/- U T