Ravi Shankar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62507 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-134 Year-2025 Thana- SAHPUR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Ravi Shankar Singh S/O Sudama Prasad Resident of Village- Sarna, P.S. - Sahpur, District- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rajani Ranjan Pd. Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Yogendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 09-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sahpur P.S. Case No. 134 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that while Tilak ceremony of the one Amit Kumar was going on, the petitioner started misbehaving with one dancer and on her protest, the petitioner has assaulted one dancer by means of lathi due to which she sustained injuries.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62507 of 2025(2) dt.09-09-2025 2/3 the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner has got no any intention to kill anyone. The petitioner went in the program and asked them to stop the programme because due to loud noise the family members of the petitioner were unable to sleep. It is further submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated due to village politics. The petitioner is in custody since 04.06.2025 and has got no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail after framing of charge, if not already framed on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sahpur P.S. Case No. 134 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:
(I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62507 of 2025(2) dt.09-09-2025 3/3 (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T