Puja Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62277 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-53 Year-2025 Thana- KATRA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.

Puja Kumari Daughter of Amol Rai Resident of Village- Jajuar Madhya PSKatra District- Muzaffarpur 2.

Kumari Palak @ Palak Kumari Daughter of Vinod Rai Resident of VillageJajuar Madhya PS- Katra District- Muzaffarpur 3.

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan son of vinod Rai Resident of Village- Jajuar Madhya PS- Katra District- Muzaffarpur 4.

Mukesh Kumar Rai @ Mukesh Kumar son of Chandeshwar Rai Resident of Village- Anyaypur, Ps- Katra, Dist- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-09-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 127(2), 223, 121(2), 192, 174, 262, 117(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 62, 324(4), 324(5), 125, 61(2), 352, 351(2) and 351(4) of the B.N.S. and later on, Sections 192 and 132 of the B.N.S. were added.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62277 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 2/3

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, attacked the police party as a result of which some of the police personnel sustained injuries and thus, created hindrance in discharge of their official duty.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. From bare perusal of the F.I.R. it is apparent that there is no specific allegation of assault or any overt act against these petitioners. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners and submitted that petitioners are named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation that they attacked the police party as a result of which some police personnel sustained injuries and thus, created hindrance in discharge of their official duties.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, accusation that these petitioners attacked the police party and have taken law in their hands, the prayer for grant of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62277 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 3/3 anticipatory bail to the petitioners is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T