Birendra Prasad v. The State Bank Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18565 of 2019 ====================================================== Birendra Prasad S/o Sri Ramasharay Prasad Vill.- Madhu Chapra, P.o.- Belwatia, P.S.- Pipra Kothi, Distt.- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Bank of India through its Chairman, Head Office, Mumbai 2.

The General Manager State Bank of India, Local Head Office, Patna 3.

The Zonal Manager State Bank of India, Zonal Office, Muzaffarpur 4.

The Branch Manager State Bank of India, Pipra Branch, East Champaran ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondents-Bank :

Mr. Harshwardhan Sahay, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 05-07-2021 Heard Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Harshwardhan Sahay, learned counsel for the Respondents-Bank through video conferencing.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and this writ application has become infructuous. Accordingly, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application. Learned counsel for the Respondents-Bank is present and he has no objection.

Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed as having become infructuous.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) S.Ali/- U T