Niranjan Kumar @ Ranjan Kumar @ Lawlesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72382 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-527 Year-2018 Thana- GAYA KOTWALI District- Gaya ====================================================== NIRANJAN KUMAR @ RANJAN KUMAR @ LAWLESH KUMAR SON OF DWARIKA YADAV R/O VILLAGE- MAHUARI, P.S.- BARACHATI, DISTRICT- GAYA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravindra Kumar Sinha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Umesh Lal Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-05-2022 Let the defects, as pointed out by the office, be removed within four weeks of starting of Court proceeding in physical mode in normal course.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State through video conferencing. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence under Section 120B and 115 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The case relates to recovery of one country made pistol along with two live cartridges.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that according to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72382 of 2021(2) dt.06-05-2022 2/3 the F.I.R and seizure list, one loaded country made pistol along with two cartridges are said to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner but, in fact, nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner rather the police has prepared false and fabricated seizure list implicating the petitioner. He further submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot. He further submits that the police after investigation has submitted charge-sheet in this case against the petitioner. The petitioner is rotting in judicial custody since 12.12.2018. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner carries four more cases other than the present one.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the, above named, petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No.

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72382 of 2021(2) dt.06-05-2022 3/3 Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be canceled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) brajesh/- U T