Patna High CourtCR. REV./6/2019dismissed

Aparna Tripathi v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2024-01-16Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL REVISION No.6 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-1111 Thana- District- ====================================================== Aparna Tripathi, wife of Gyanendra Kumari Tripathi, Daughter of Shri Ganga Sharan Mishra, Permanent Resident of - Koyal Bagh Colony, P.S. Shahar Kolwali, District - Hardoi, U.P.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar 2.

Gyanendra Kumar Tripathi, Son of Late Bala Tripathi, Resident of VillagePaharganj, P.S.- Gauriganj, District- Amethi, U.P at present Assistant Commissioner of Customs and GST, Presently posted as Assistant Commissioner AR at O/o The Commissioner (AR), CESTAT (Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal), 38 M.G. Marg, Allahabad U.P. ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Ms. Aparna Tripathi (in person) For the State :

Md. Fahimuddin, APP For the O.P. No. 2 :

Ms. Soni Srivastava, Sr. Advocate Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 16-01-2024 The petitioner appears in person. The opposite party no. 2 is represented by Ms. Soni Srivastava, learned senior counsel along with Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Singh, learned Advocate and Md. Fahimuddin, learned APP represents the State.

2. Earlier vide order dated 01.11.2022, this Court directed the learned court below to finally dispose of the Domestic Violence Case after hearing the parties positively within 45 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of the order.

3. The parties agreed that the learned court below has

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.6 of 2019(16) dt.16-01-2024 2/2 finally decided the Domestic Violence Case and being aggrieved by the order of the learned court below, the petitioner has preferred a Criminal Appeal under the provisions of Domestic Violence Act.

4. This revision application was preferred against the order dismissing the Criminal Appeal of the petitioner which had been preferred against an interim order passed in the Domestic Violence Case. With the dismissal of the Domestic Violence Case, the interim order has merged into the same.

5. There is no dispute between the parties that this application has been rendered infructuous. It is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) SUSHMA2/- U