← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./79158/2018bail granted

Sonu Sharma @ Sonu v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2019-09-17Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79158 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-66 Year-2018 Thana- AURANGABAD COMPLAINT CASE District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Sonu Sharma @ Sonu, S/O Mahendra Sharma, R/O Village Kama Bigha, P.S. Musfassil, District -Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Sema Devi, W/O Sonu Sharma@Sonu, D/O Ram Pravesh Sharma, R/O Village Kama Bigha, P.S. Mufassil, district- Aurangabad. At preset R/ village Rani Kuaw, P.S. Madanpur, District- Aurangabad ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Smt. Veena Rani Prasadd.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 17-09-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 66 of 2018, registered under Sections 379 and 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the D.P. Act and later on, cognizance was taken under Sections 323 and 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the D.P. Act. The accusation is of torturing the complainant-opposite party no.2 by her husband and in-laws due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry and removing from her matrimonial house. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on the joint prayer, the matter was referred to the Mediation Centre, Patna

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79158 of 2018(6) dt.17-09-2019 2/2 High Court, Patna, for settlement of dispute in between the petitioner and the complainant-opposite party no. 2, who are husband and wife, but the matter could not be settled due to rigid attitude of parents of opposite party no. 2.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the complainantopposite party no. 2 submits that, in fact, petitioner never approached at the Maika of opposite party no. 2 to take her in Bidai. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in connection with Complaint Case No. 66 of 2018, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T