← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./62391/2025bail granted

Ranjan Yadav @ Saurabh Yadav @ Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-12Justice Smt. Soni Shrivastava3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62391 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-199 Year-2025 Thana- JHAJHA District- Jamui ====================================================== Ranjan Yadav @ Saurabh Yadav @ Ranjan Kumar son of Bedu Yadav @ Vedu Yadav Resident Of Village- sojana, Ps- Jhajha, Dist- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 12-09-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case no.199 of 2025 registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 351 & 109 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. The allegation in the first information report is that the informant was assaulted by a person who was in an intoxicated condition by means of a rod on his head and while he was going to call the police, he was threatened on the way by the present petitioner, Ranjan Yadav with facing dire consequences if he lodged an FIR.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the first information report, it is not very clear whether it was

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62391 of 2025(2) dt.12-09-2025 2/3 this petitioner who had actually made the assault, as his name has been taken to be the person who had threatened the informant against lodging of an FIR. It is further submitted that no motive whatsoever has been alleged in the first information report and the injury suffered by the victim is also simple in nature in the opinion of the doctor. The petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the case/trial.

5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering that the injury suffered by the informant is simple in nature as would be evident from the bail rejection order itself and also further considering that there is no repetition of close alleged, and the petitioner who has no criminal antecedent, let the above named petitioner who has no criminal antecedent, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case no.199 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui, subject to the condition laid

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62391 of 2025(2) dt.12-09-2025 3/3 down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S, 2023. (Soni Shrivastava, J) krishnakant/- U T