Vinay Roy Vinay Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74152 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2019 Thana- BAKHTIYARPUR District- Patna ====================================================== VINAY ROY VINAY RAY Son of Vishun Dev Roy Resident of MohallaNaya Tola Simri, P.S- Bakhtiyarpur, Dist- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anand Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 20-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on order of Chandan Rai, this petitioner assaulted Bablu with an iron rod causing injury on his head and thereafter Kundan assaulted him with lathi on his neck and Jatahu Rai and Mohan Rai assaulted informant's mother with lathi and danda and thereafter Mohan Rai snatched gold chain from mother of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74152 of 2022(4) dt.20-06-2023 2/3 informant. It is further alleged that Chandan Rai assaulted the informant with lathi causing fracture of his left hand and thereafter the petitioner took out Rs. 25,000/- from his pocket.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that the petitioner and the informant are related with each other and on account of dispute relating to land, the petitioner has been falsely implicated. It is further submitted that even from perusal of the injury report, it would manifest that the injury is simple in nature and the blow was not repeated.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74152 of 2022(4) dt.20-06-2023 3/3 case is pending/successor court in connection with Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 112 of 2019 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T