Basudeo Sah And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12546 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Basudeo Sah Son of late Palat Sah

2. Shyam Sunder Gupta S/o late Ramadhin Sah

3. Lal Bihari Sah S/o late Chamaklal Sah

4. Naresh Rajak Son of late Daurik Rajak All are resident of VillageRupani, P.S +P.O. Chautham, District Khagaria. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The District Magistrate, Khagaria.

3. The District Land Acquisition Officer, Khagaria.

4. The Circle Officer, P.O.+P.S Chautham District Khagaria.

5. The Secretary, Road Transport National Highway Ministry, Union of India, New Delhi.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satya Ranjan Sinha, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ram Balak Mahto, A.G. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 14-02-2017 This matter has been listed under the heading "To Be Mentioned" on the basis of mentioning slip filed on behalf of the petitioners.

Heard the parties.

The lands of petitioners were notified for construction of road and thereafter, petitioners raised objection before the District Magistrate, Khagaria and other officers by filing representations but till the date of filing of this writ petition, the representations filed by the petitioners were not disposed of. However, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners

Patna High Court CWJC No.12546 of 2015 (2) dt.14-02-2017 2/2 submits that this writ petition may be disposed of with direction to concerned authorities to pass appropriate order on the representations filed by the petitioners within a prescribed period of time.

Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that he has no information regarding pendency of any objection/representation. However, he submits that this writ petition may be disposed of with direction to concerned authorities to dispose of the objection/representations of the petitioners, if the same has not been disposed of as yet.

In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, this writ petition stands disposed of giving direction to respondents no. 2 and 3 to pass appropriate order on the representations filed on behalf of the petitioners, if the same has not been disposed of as yet, within three weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order.

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) SHAHZAD/- U