← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/12477/2015dismissed

Veermani Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-02-06Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran1 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.12477 of 2015 (8) dt.06-02-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12477 of 2015 ====================================================== Veermani Kumar son of Randhir Kumar Sudhanshu, resident of Village - Madarichak, P.S-Makhdumpur, Dist - Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Human Resources Development Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The President Officer, the District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, Arwal.

4.

The District Magistrate, Arwal.

5.

The District Education Officer, Arwal.

6.

The District Programme Officer, (Establishment), Arwal. 7.

The Block Development Officer Karpi (Arwal).

8.

The Block Education Officer Karpi (Arwal).

9.

The Chairman cum Mukhiya Panchayat Shikshak Selection Committee Keyal Gram Panchayat, Karpi (Arwal).

10. The Panchayat Secretary, Keyal Gram Panchayat, Karpi (Arwal).

11. Rajesh Kumar son of Dhurga Yadav resident of village Mahabir Ganj , P.O. Keyal, P.S. Karpi, Dist - Arwal.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sheo Shankar Pd., 10 For the Private Respondent : Rajeev Kumar Singh, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 06-02-2017 Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh files a counter affidavit on behalf of the private respondent. Let it be taken on record. None appears on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. Sheo Shankar Prasad, learned Standing Counsel No.10 for the State and Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for the private respondent are present.

The order recorded on 20.1.2017 reflects that the counsel for the petitioner was in a predicament whether or not to press the writ petition and today he is conspicuous by his absence. In the circumstances, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

(Jyoti Saran, J) SKPathak/- U