Sita Ram Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61254 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2025 Thana- JAMALPUR District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Sita Ram Yadav S/O Late Ramjee Yadav Resident of Village- Pakariya, P.S.- Jamalpur, District- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 10-09-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending his arrest in connection with Jamalpur P.S. Case no. 33 of 2025, registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 118(1), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, over an earlier dispute relating to information having been given to the police about the accused having stored illicit liquor, it is stated that the petitioner is said to have forcibly assaulted the informant with a farsa on his head. Further co-accused Sanjay Yadav is said to have assaulted the informant with a lathi on his back.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case because of previous dispute which would be evident from the contents of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61254 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 2/2 the FIR itself. Referring to the injury of the informant which finds mention in the order of the learned Court below it is submitted that the doctor is said to have found mild scalp swelling over right parietal bone on the person of the informant. Thus the injury report does not support the prosecution case. The petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the investigation/trial.

5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioner in the F.I.R and the injury report of the informant which finds discussed in the order of the learned Court below, in the facts of the case, it is directed that the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Jamalpur P.S. Case no. 33 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Biraul, Darbhanga. (Partha Sarthy, J) Shiv/- U T