Ranvijay Chaudhary @ Mitthu Don @ Mintu Kumar Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62868 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-388 Year-2024 Thana- ARA NAWADA District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Ranvijay Chaudhary @ Mitthu Don @ Mintu Kumar Chaudhary Son of Late Gaya Chaudhary Resident of Village - Anaith, Kurmi Tola, P.S.- Nawada, Dist. - Bhojpur at Ara.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rama Kant Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ahmad Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 17-09-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 448, 385 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of three cases and the informant alleges that petitioner along with 2-3 unknown accused came and demanded extortion of Rs.10 Lacs. On protest, firing was made and informant was threatened to leave the house.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62868 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 2/3 informant. It is further submitted that date of occurrence is 23.05.2024 and the FIR was instituted on 06.06.2024 i.e. after a delay of 13 days. Further, from the place of occurrence, no empty cartridge was recovered nor the FIR discloses that as to who fired. It is next submitted that since petitioner has antecedent, hence he has been implicated. It is also submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his innocence.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Nawada P. S. Case No.388 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. one of the bailors of the petitioners shall be sister in-law Raj Kumari Devi.

7. The application stands allowed.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62868 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 3/3

8. However, it is made clear that in the event, if any application is filed by the Investigating Officer before the learned trial Court bringing to its notice that petitioner, despite giving assurance to this Court, is not cooperating in the investigation or is not presenting himself as and when required, the learned trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after recording reasons.

9. Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned Police Station through the learned trial Court. (Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T