Patna High CourtCR. MISC./910/2019bail granted

Umesh Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

2019-01-28Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.910 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-719 Year-2016 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada ====================================================== Umesh Manjhi Son of Dilip Manjhi R/o Mohalla- Line Par Mirjapur, Mushahari Tola, P.S. Nawada Town, District- Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Birendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Smt. Asha Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 28-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Nawada Town P.S. Case No. 719 of 2016 registered for offence punishable under sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and 30 (a) Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation has been made that 4.5 litres of illegal liquor has been recovered. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Looking to the quantity of liquor and the clean antecedent of petitioner, his prayer for bail is allowed and he, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today, is directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.910 of 2019(2) dt.28-01-2019 2/2 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.D.J.-cum-Special Judge, Nawada in connection with Nawada Town P.S. Case No.719 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 Cr. PC and also subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. If the petitioner is found involved in similar type of allegation in future, the prosecution will have liberty to file an application for cancellation of his bail. (Shivaji Pandey, J) mkchy/- U T