Anant Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59575 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-216 Year-2018 Thana- BHELDI District- Saran ====================================================== Anant Singh, Son of Labhit Singh, Resident of Mohalla-Karbala Road, Muzaffarpur, Police Station-Muzaffarpur Sadar in the district of Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjeet Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Madhuri Lata ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 20-09-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bheldi P.S. Case No. 216 of 2018, registered under Sections 279, 337, 338, 332, 333, 353, 304 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code.

The accusation is that on receiving information about collusion of two vehicles in Village- Samastpura, the informant along with other police personal reached there then saw that road was blocked. Thereafter, attempt was being made to clear the road by removing both vehicles. In the meantime, a Star Bus, which was being driven by this petitioner came and dashed with the tractor, in which, Dililp Nut, who was present

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59575 of 2019(2) dt.20-09-2019 2/2 on the road, sustained injury and died on the spot and SubInspector, Amit Kumar, who was also present for clearing the road, sustained injury and died subsequently, in course of treatment.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits petitioner was driving the Star Bus, in which, Barat party was present, but all of sudden, a tractor came in front of bus on the road due to that reason, accident took place, in which, two persons died.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the trial court within four weeks and pray for regular bail, which would be considered by the trial court in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T