Niranjan Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.28677 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -155 Year- 2016 Thana -AMARPUR District- BANKA ======================================================
1. Niranjan Singh Son of Late Abhiram Singh
2. Gourav Singh @ Matra Singh Son of Late Bike Singh
3. Sanjeev Singh, Son of Ranvir Singh All are resident of Village- Kathail, P.S.- Amarpur, District- Banka. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Bhushan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 26-07-2016 Heard leaned counsel for the petitioners and counsel for the State.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Amarpur P.S. Case No. 155 of 2016 for offence under Sections 114, 147, 188, 341, 323, 332, 337, 353, 435, 427 of the Indian Penal Code.
The brief fact of this case is that the Deputy S.P. (Probation) cum S.H.O., Amarpur police station received information that on account of road accident with a tractor, one female and one minor child have been killed. The villagers have jammed the road and resorted to violence. It was informed that large numbers of persons have assembled there.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28677 of 2016 (2) dt.26-07-2016 It is an admitted fact that there is no specific allegation against the petitioners.
Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, namely, Niranjan Singh, Gourav Singh @ Matra Singh and Sanjeev Singh, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in connection with Amarpur P.S. Case No. 155 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioners for investigation/interrogation, they will remain present and if they would not present themselves, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been cancelled. (Shivaji Pandey, J) Rishi/- U T