Patna High CourtCR. MISC./30342/2016bail granted

Vishal Kumar @ Vishal Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2016-08-24Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.30342 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -209 Year- 2013 Thana -AGAMKUAN District- PATNA ====================================================== Vishal Kumar @ Vishal Singh, Son of Prem Chand Singh, Resident of Mohalla- Daldali Road, P.S.- Kadamkuan, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Babita Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Sri Vinod Shankar Modi (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 24-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected on four times, on the ground that trial has not been concluded within time given and from the report of the learned Trial Judge, it reveals that in near future, the trial is not likely to be concluded, to which the learned A.P.P. opposes. In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 19.07.2013 and in near future the trial is not likely to be concluded and as such, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30342 of 2016 (3) dt.24-08-2016 2/2 Additional Sessions Judge-III, Patna, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 311 of 2014, arising out of Agamkuan P.S. Case No. 209 of 2013, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail and petitioner shall not make any attempt to influence the prosecution witnesses and shall co-operate during trial.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T