Pramod Yadav @ Dablu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67583 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-586 Year-2021 Thana- SIWAN MUFFASIL District- Siwan ====================================================== PRAMOD YADAV @ DABLU Son of Subhash Chaudhari Resident of village - Jiyayn (Jiyan), P.S.- Siwan Muffasil, District - Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narsingh Tanti, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 12-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 10.11.2021 in connection with Siwan Muffasil P.S. Case No. 586 of 2021, F.I.R. dated 10.11.2021 for the offences punishable under Sections 399, 402 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-B)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

Recovery is of one loaded country made pistol from the possession of the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that it appears from the F.I.R. as well as seizure list that one loaded country made pistol was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. He further

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67583 of 2022(6) dt.12-07-2023 2/3 submits that there is non-compliance with mandatory procedure prescribed for recovery under Section 100 of Cr.P.C. He further submits that the police after investigation submitted the charge sheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in judicial custody since 10.11.2021.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner on the ground that petitioner carries four criminal antecedents other than the present one but fairly submits that petitioner is on bail in all the cases.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and period of custody, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Siwan in connection with Siwan Muffasil P.S. Case No. 586 of 2021, subject to the following conditions:-

1. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67583 of 2022(6) dt.12-07-2023 3/3 bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

2. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

3. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) mdrashid/- U T