Runa Devi @ Runi Devi And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.80568 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2018 Thana- SINDHWARA District- Darbhanga ======================================================

1. Runa Devi @ Runi Devi W/o Wakil Thakur

2. Mamta Devi W/o Umesh Thakur Both resident of Village- Bharwara, P.S.- Singhwara, District- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 28-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307 and 448 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Singhwara P.S. Case No. 112 of 2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the backdrop of a petty dispute and there is case and counter case between the parties. It is further submitted that no specific accusation of assault on anyone has been alleged against the petitioners, who are ladies and claim clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioners' arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in connection with Singhwara P.S. Case No. 112 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.80568 of 2018(2) dt.28-01-2019 2/2 and with further conditions -- (i) That one of the bailors of each of the petitioners shall be their close relatives.

(ii) That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioners will be well represented in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (iv) That the petitioners shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. BT/Chandran (Vikash Jain, J) U T