Patna High CourtCR. MISC./5812/2017bail granted

Raghunandan @ Ragho Sada v. The State Of Bihar

2017-02-16Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5812 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -25 Year- 2016 Thana -SALKHUA District- SAHARSA ======================================================

1. Raghunandan @ Ragho Sada Son of late Jhakas Sada Resident of Village- Purainee, Ward No. 1 Musaharitola, P.S.- Salkhua, DistrictSaharsa. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Diwakar Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Nirmala Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-02-2017 The petitioner is in custody since 05.12.2016 in connection with Salkhua P.S. Case No. 25 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner only allegation against the petitioner is that he was last seen with the deceased and except that there is nothing against the petitioner so as to implicate him in the present case and he has been in judicial custody since 05.12.2016.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances and that save and except last seen theory, there is nothing against the petitoiner, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5812 of 2017 (2) dt.16-02-2017 2/2 Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Ram Tripathi, learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Saharsa, in connection with Salkhua P.S. Case No. 25 of 2016, with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T