← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16589/2022disposed

Mithilesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-03-12Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16589 of 2022 ====================================================== Mithilesh Kumar Son of Dudheshwar Prasad, resident of village - Koraipur, P.S. - Obra, District - Aurangabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Health Department, Patna.

2.

The Director in Chief, Health Services, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Aurangabad. 4.

The Executive Director, State Health Society, Bihar Patna. 5.

The District Health Society through Civil Surgeon, Obra, Aurangabad. 6.

The Chairman District Health Society-cum-District Magistrate, Aurangabad. 7.

The Incharge Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre Obra, Aurangabad. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Braj Kishore Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Ramadhar Singh, GP-25 For respondent no.4 :

Ms. Aditi Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 12-03-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "i. For issuance of an appropriate writ / writs in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to make payment of compensation of Rs. Four lakhs 400000/- with interest to the petitioner (dependent & widower) of Asha Karyakarta (worker) namely Sumila Devi died on 28.07.2015 working as Aasha Karyakarta under primary Health Centre, Obra, Aurangabad. ii. Further for issuance of a direction to the respondents to dispose of the representation of

Patna High Court CWJC No.16589 of 2022(2) dt.12-03-2024 2/2 petitioner according to law, submitted to the District Magistrate Cum Chairman District Health Society, Aurangabad and to the District Health Society officer, Aurangabad."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the respondent no.3, i.e. the Civil Surgeoncum-Chief Medical Officer, Aurangabad for redressal of his aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted. 3.

It is needless to state that in case appropriate representation is filed, within a period of two weeks from today, the Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Aurangabad shall dispose off the same by passing a reasoned and a speaking order, in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks, thereafter.

4.

The writ petition stands disposed off on the aforesaid terms.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/- U