Md.Imran v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1235 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4517 of 2011 ====================================================== Md. Imran S/O Taukir Alam R/O Village- Madaini, P.S.- Sheosagar, District- Rohtas .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. The Education Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. The District Magistrate, Rohtas

4. The District Superintendent of Education, Rohtas

5. The Block Development Officer, Sheosagar, District- Rohtas

6. Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Sonhar Block Sheosagar, District- Rohtas

7. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Sonhar, Block- Sheosagar, District- Rohtas

8. Sanjay Kumar Rai Son of Sri Kanchan Rai resident of village- Mauni, P.S.- Sheosagar, District- Rohtas .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Shiw Kumar Prabhakar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Indradeo Prasad, SC-27 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 10-07-2017 Considering the fact that the learned Writ Court has interfered into the matter by recording specific finding that the respondent No. 8 is more meritorious candidate and was deliberately prevented from taking appointment order even though he was present, we find no reason to interfere into the matter. However, on account of any further reason pertaining

Patna High Court LPA No.1235 of 2014 (5) dt.10-07-2017 2/2 to appointment of respondent No. 8, the present appellant, Md. Imran is at liberty to proceed to challenge the appointment on any other ground in accordance with law.

The appeal is dismissed.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) S.Pandey/- U