Arun Kumar Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.79106 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-150 Year-2018 Thana- HATHUA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Arun Kumar Gupta Son of Brij Kishore Gupta Resident of village Manichhapar, P.S. - Hathua, Distt. - Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjeev Nikesh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Iftekhar Mahmood ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State as also counsel for the Informant. In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Hathua P.S. Case No. 150 of 2018 registered for offences under sections 363, 366(A), 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

In the present case, an allegation has been made that the victim girl was kidnapped by the petitioner. The victim girl in the statement made under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C., she has stated that she had fair and love relationship with the petitioner but, when the petitioner has entered into marriage, everything was wiped out and said that she had gone along with the petitioner to Patna, Asam and Allahabad.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.79106 of 2018(2) dt.10-01-2019 2/2 Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, namely, Arun Kumar Gupta, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Hathua P.S. Case No. 150 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for investigation/interrogation, he will remain present and if he would not present himself, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been canceled.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T