Ram Singhasan Prasad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.8146 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -113 Year- 2016 Thana -PARAIYA District- GAYA ====================================================== Ram Singhasan Prasad Son of late Ramautar Prasad Resident of VillageManjhar, P.S. Paraiya, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Saxena, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur, App ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-02-2017 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 25 (1-b)a/26 of the Arms Act.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that no specific allegation is there against the petitioner. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. There is case and counter case between the parties and both sides have received injuries.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and on perusal of the record it appears that there is case and counter case between the parties
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8146 of 2017 (2) dt.27-02-2017 2/2 and so far injuries are concerned, nothing is there to show that injuries are grievous in nature, let above named petitioner, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Gaya, in connection with Paraiya P.S. Case no. 113 of 2016 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and also subject to the conditions that (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available before the police as and when required.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudip/- U T