Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32764/2016bail granted

Jai Prakash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2016-09-26Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32764 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -204 Year- 2015 Thana -CHENARI District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Jai Prakash Kumar, Son of Kauri Ram, resident of Chenari Bazar, South Mohalla, P.S. Chenari, District - Rohtas .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vikram Deo Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Madhuri Lata, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 26-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Sessions Trial No.101 of 2016, arising out of Chenari P.S. Case No.204 of 2015, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 342, 324 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation has been made against the petitioner that he had caused injury on the neck of the informant by sharp cutting weapon that led to oozing out of the blood. It has further been alleged that on raising alarm, the petitioner inflicted dragger blow upon the informant.

The injury certificate suggests that the injury

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32764 of 2016 (3) dt.26-09-2016 2/2 received by the informant is grievous in nature. The petitioner is in jail since 03.11.2015.

Looking to the period of custody, let the petitionerJai Prakash Kumar, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10, 000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the 8th Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with Sessions Trial No.101 of 2016, arising out of Chenari P.S. Case No.204 of 2015 subject to the condition that the petitioner would cooperate in the proceeding of the court below and in the event of being absent on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation, the court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U T