Santosh Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31894 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -298 Year- 2015 Thana -HISUA District- NAWADA ======================================================

1. Santosh Yadav, son of Sri Gango Yadav

2. Ranjeet Yadav, son of Sri Gango Yadav

3. Pintu Yadav, son of Sri Lakhan Yadav All the resident of village Tungi Beldari, P.S. Hisua, District Nawada .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Ranjan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Parmanand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 29-08-2016 Heard Sri Rajesh Ranjan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Parmanand Kumar, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor.

Three petitioners, who are named as accused in Hisua P.S. Case No.298 of 2015 registered for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, have prayed for grant of bail in the event of their arrest. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. He further submits that during investigation, in the re-statement, the informant has made specific accusation against petitioner no.1, namely, Santosh Yadav.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31894 of 2016 (2) dt.29-08-2016 2/2 However, after perusing the F.I.R. I do not find any ground to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail. The petition stands dismissed.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) NKS/- U T