Billa Alam @ Billa v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64917 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-73 Year-2025 Thana- RUPAULI District- Purnia ====================================================== Billa Alam @ Billa S/o Md. Gyas Nadaf @ Md. Gyas Uddin R/o VillageDhobgidha Rupauli, P.S.- Rupauli, District- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vinay Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-12-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for offences punishable under Sections 317(4), 317(5), and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. During vehicle checking, the police apprehended one person carrying two bags on a motorcycle, and on search of those bags, a total of 79 mobile phones of different companies, including 21 pieces of mobile phone batteries and 11 pieces of mobile phone displays, were recovered without any valid documents. The apprehended person disclosed his name as Md. Mohibul and further disclosed that he had purchased these stolen mobile phones and other articles at a low price from Birauli market, from the shop of this petitioner and other coaccused persons.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64917 of 2025(2) dt.05-12-2025 2/2 apprehended person, Md. Mohibul, disclosed the name of the petitioner. No stolen article has been recovered from the shop or conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner also claims to have clean antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea, in connection with Rupauli P.S. Case No. 73 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Neha/- U T