← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/18035/2019disposed

Mansoor Alam v. The State Of Bihar

2019-09-03Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18035 of 2019 ====================================================== Mansoor Alam, S/o Late Lukman Hakim, R/o Ward No. 01, Village Manjhaili, P.O.- Milik Pehlagarh, P.S.- Pranpur, District- Katihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Department Human Resources, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Chairman, through the Bihar State Madrasa Education Board, Patna. 3.

The Secretary, Bihar State Madrasa Education Board, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate, District- Katihar.

5.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), District- Katihar. 6.

The Secretary of the School Managing Committee of Serajul Uloom Gosaipur, Manjhaili, Madrasa No. 696, P.S.- Pranpur, Block- Pranpur, District- Katihar.

7.

The Head Maulvi of Serajul Uloom Gosaipur Manjhaili, Madrasa No. 696, situated in P.S.- Pranpur, Block- Pranpur, District- Katihar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Giri, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Subash Chandra Mishra (SC-16) For Respondents : Mr. Sri Prakash Srivastava Md. Aslam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 03-09-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents.

The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ application is non-disposal of his representation. The petitioner represented the Bihar State Madarsa Education Board, Patna on 21.08.2019, but the same has not been considered by the respondent and gathering dust in the office of respondent nos. 2 and 3.

Patna High Court CWJC No.18035 of 2019(2) dt.03-09-2019 2/2 Considering the aforesaid, the writ application is disposed of with a direction to the respondent nos. 2 and 3 to take appropriate final decision on the claim of the petitioner at the earliest preferably within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) uday/- U