Md. Jahangeer @ Jahangeer Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.116 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-117 Year-2021 Thana- BAKHARI District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1.

MD. JAHANGEER @ JAHANGEER ANSARI SON OF LATE MD. SHAFIK ANSARI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MAKHACHAK, NAGAR PARISHAD BAKHRI, WARD NO. 04, P.S. BAKHRI, DISTRICTBEGUSARAI 2.

MD EJAAZ ANSARI @ MD EJAAZ SON OF LATE MD. SHAFIK ANSARI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MAKHACHAK, NAGAR PARISHAD BAKHRI, WARD NO. 04, P.S. BAKHRI, DISTRICTBEGUSARAI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sandip Kumar Gautam For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Chandra Bhushan Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 01-08-2022 The learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Shailendra Kumar, elearned APP for the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, registered in connection with Bakhri P.S.Case No. 117 of 2021.

As per allegation, the accused persons including the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.116 of 2022(2) dt.01-08-2022 2/3 petitioners came near the house of the informant where he was sitting beside the road. The allegation against petitioner no.1 is that he assaulted him with dagger on him head and neck and made him injured. The allegation against petitioner no.2 is that he assaulted the informant with fists and slaps. The reason behind the occurrence is stated to be quarrel amongst the children of both parties and one Md. Ghalib Ansari assaulted the child of the informant.

The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are persons of clean antecedent. The reason behind the occurrence is of trivial issue of quarrel of children and the informant sustained simple injury.

On the other hand, learned APP has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail and submitted that there is specific allegation against petitioner no.1 to assault the informant. Considering the above facts and circumstances as well as the clean antecedent of the petitioners, let them above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from the date of communication of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.116 of 2022(2) dt.01-08-2022 3/3 Bakhri P.S.Case No. 117 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C.

Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioners within the stipulated time as provided hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) HR/- U T