Rajeev Kumar Lal @ Ravi v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12002 of 2017 (2) dt.24-03-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12002 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -239 Year- 2015 Thana -PUPRI District- SITAMARHI ====================================================== Rajeev Kumar Lal @ Ravi S/o Sri Ram Sharan Lal Karn @ Ram Sharan Lal @ Ram Waran Lal, Resident of Village- Balha Maqsudan, P.S.- Pupri District- Sitamarhi.

.... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Matloob Rab, APP-34 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 24-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Pupri P.S. Case No. 239 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 323 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. On the basis of complaint petition this case has been lodged alleging that earlier Complaint Case No. 357 of 2014 was filed against the petitioner and others under Section 498A IPC and on the order of the court the petitioner took away the complainant with him on 11.08.2015 but the petitioner and others started torturing her and threatened to kill her, then she informed her brother Manish Kumar on 12.08.2015 and her brother informed the Police of Pupari Police Station, thereafter, Police party came and saved her.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12002 of 2017 (2) dt.24-03-2017 Submission is of false implication and that the complainant/informant is in habit to lodge case after case, she is adamant to ruin the life of the petitioner, the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent besides the case lodged by the complainant/informant, he is suffering in custody since 20.01.2017 and as such he deserves sympathetic consideration. Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the period of detention, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Pupri, Sitamarhi in connection with Pupri P.S. Case No. 239 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T