Ramesh Datt Pandey v. The State Of Bihar Through Vigilance Patna
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.17230 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1 Year- 2018 Thana -C.B.I CASE District- MUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Ramesh Datt Pandey S/o Ram Ekbal Pandey, Resident of VillageOjhawaliya, P.S. Brahmpur, District-Buxar. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Through Vigilance Patna .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Babita Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rama Kant Sharma(L.O, I/C Vig.) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 27-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State and vigilance.
This is a case registered under Sections 7,8,13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. It is submitted by the petitioner's counsel that the alleged amount of bribe of Rs. 10,000/- was recovered from the Chaukidar and not from the petitioner. He is in custody in connection with this case since 05.01.2018. Prior to the instant case the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and that due to extraneous consideration he has been implicated in this case. In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner above named be released on bail on his furnishing bonds of Rs 10,000/- (Rupees
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17230 of 2018 (3) dt.27-04-2018 2/2 Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge Vigilance, North Bihar, Muzaffarpur in Vigilance P.S. Case No. 01 of 2018 (Special Case No. 3 of 2018) subject to the conditions : (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner.
(ii) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J) Prakash/- U