Braj Nandan Singh @ Brij Nandan Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.11736 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -238 Year- 2016 Thana -DELHA District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Braj Nandan Singh @ Brij Nandan Singh , Son of Late Ram Kripal Singh.

2. Gyanti Devi@ Gayanti Devi Wife of Braj Nandan Singh@ Brij Nandan Singh. Both Resident of Village- Mahasi Chak Police Station Kinjar, District- Jahanabad at Present Resident at Mohalla Kharkhura Chamar Toli, Police Station-Delha, District- Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Smt Pushpa Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 03-04-2017 This is an application for grant of bail for offences punishable under Sections 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that there is no specific allegation of assault against the petitioners. It has come in the case diary that as a matter of fact the quarrel took place between the mother-in-law and the deceased and due to which the occurrence took place. As a matter of fact, the deceased had complaint about the quarrel to his husband and father-in-law but they did not pay heed to it. The petitioners are in custody for about four months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also. He has opposed the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11736 of 2017 (3) dt.03-04-2017 2/2 prayer for bail.

Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that there is no direct allegation against the petitioners and they are fatherin-law and mother-in-law of the petitioners, let above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Delha P.S. Case no. 238 of 2016 with the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned. (ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure on their part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudip/- U T