Patna High CourtCR. MISC./12023/2017rejected

Ajay Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2017-03-27Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12023 of 2017 (2) dt.27-03-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12023 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -156 Year- 2014 Thana -RUPASPUR District- PATNA ====================================================== Ajay Kumar Singh, son of Late Krishna Kumar Singh, resident of MohallaChandmari Road, P.S.- Kankarbagh, District- Patna..... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Indrajeet Bhushan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Prem Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 27-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 156 of 2014 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 17, 18, 21, 22, 27(A) of N.D.P.S. Act and Sections 25(1b)a, 26/35 of the Arms Act. Allegedly, the petitioner and other co-accused were apprehended and from possession of the petitioner 100 grams Heroin and cash of Rs. 4200/- were recovered whereas from possession of other co-accused also Heroin, arms and ammunitions were recovered.

Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner has been made victim of circumstances, nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession, without any criminal antecedent he is suffering in custody since 27.07.2014, up-till now no

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12023 of 2017 (2) dt.27-03-2017 prosecution witness has been examined and as such he deserves sympathetic consideration as in near future the trial is not likely to be concluded.

Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the alleged recovery, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail, accordingly, his such prayer stands rejected. However, let the trial be expedited and concluded as early as possible, preferably within six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order after taking the same on priority basis.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T