Sandip Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57757 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-148 Year-2019 Thana- BIKRAM District- Patna ====================================================== SANDIP PASWAN Son of Kamlesh Paswan Resident of Village - Okari, P.S.- Ghosi, District- Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Syed Mojibur Rahman For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Nawal Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-09-2019 Petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Bikram P.S. Case No. 148 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation as per FIR is of committing theft of a loaded tractor and petitioner is named in the FIR and name of petitioner was disclosed by one co-accused in his statement, who was arrested with the stolen tractor.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that except confessional statement of co-accused there is nothing against him and there is no recovery from his possession and he has no criminal antecedent. Heard learned APP also.
In view of above facts and circumstances, let
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57757 of 2019(2) dt.13-09-2019 2/2 petitioner surrender in the court below within two weeks from the receipt of this order and on surrender he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, Danapur, Patna, in connection with Bikram P.S. Case No. 148 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and further condition is that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned and further condition is that petitioner has to appear before the police as and when required, otherwise his bail bonds shall be cancelled.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T