← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./64127/2025partly allowed disposal

Sunaina Devi @ Sunaini Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-10Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64127 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-295 Year-2025 Thana- PIPRA District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Sunaina Devi @ Sunaini Devi W/o Beyas Mukhiya R/o Village - Kuwarpur, Bintoli, P.S.- Pipra, District - East Champaran, Motihari. 2.

Beyash Mukhiya S/o Late Bhagrit Mukhiya R/o Village - Kuwarpur, Bintoli, P.S.- Pipra, District - East Champaran, Motihari. 3.

Akhilesh Mukhiya S/o Baidhya Nath Mukhiya R/o Village - Kuwarpur, Bintoli, P.S.- Pipra, District - East Champaran, Motihari. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sharda Nand Mishra, Advocate Mr. Sumit Kumar Gupta, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Nand Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 295 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118, 109(1), 303(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. The petitioners are accused of killing the deceased because the deceased and his family used to oppose the illegal business of selling liquor by Beyash Mukhiya i.e., petitioner no. 2 and thereafter, the petitioner no. 2 and other accused persons are said to have assaulted the victim and caused his death.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64127 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 2/2

4. Considering the allegation levelled against petitioner no. 2 i.e., Beyash Mukhiya, his application for bail is dismissed.

5. So far as petitioner nos. 1 and 3 are concerned, considering the general allegation against them and the fact that petitioner no. 1 is a woman, their prayer for bail is allowed.

6. Let the petitioner nos. 1 and 3, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Sadar, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 295 of 2025. (Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T