Inardev Kumar @ Indradev Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62834 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-56 Year-2025 Thana- CHACKMEHSI District- Samastipur ====================================================== Inardev Kumar @ Indradev Kumar S/o Santosh Sahni R/o Village- Akouna, P.S.- Chakmehshi, District- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Surya Narayan Roy For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 17-09-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 351(2), 352, 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that he along with his son had gone to the house of Santosh for asking back the loan amount of Rs. 45,000/- which he had given to him but Santosh started abusing, accordingly the informant left the place of occurrence, but in the meantime eight named accused persons including the petitioner came and assaulted him and his son near Chimney of Pramod Singh causing injury.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62834 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 2/2 4.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that no specific allegation of assault is alleged against the petitioner rather the allegation of assault is general and omnibus in nature. It is also submitted that petitioner is not a criminal.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Chakmehsi P.S. Case No. 56 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T