Jilajeet Kumar @ Birbal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63664 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-347 Year-2024 Thana- ALOULI District- Khagaria ====================================================== 1.

Jilajeet Kumar @ Birbal Kumar Son of Khokho Yadav Resident of Village - Ladoura, P.S. - Alauli, District - Khagaria.

2.

Neval Rai @ Neval Kumar Son of Khokho Yadav R/o Village - Ladoura, P.S. - Alauli, Dist. - Khagaria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Ayushi, Advocate Mr. Rahul Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajiv Nayan, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-09-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 352 and 3(5) of the BNS.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 22.08.2024 accused persons including the petitioners came variously armed and started abusing his wife and dragged her along with his daughter-in-law and assaulted the informant by butt of pistol and also his son and daughter-in-law and took away Rs.50,000/-.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63664 of 2025(2) dt.18-09-2025 2/2 informant. It is further submitted that date of occurrence is 22.08.2024 and the FIR came to be instituted on 25.08.2024 i.e. after a delay of three days without any plausible explanation. It is next submitted that mother of the petitioners instituted Alauli P.S. Case No. 342 of 2024 dated 23.08.2024, as such, the instant case was instituted by way of counterblast with no specific allegation of assault.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, let the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Alauli P.S. Case No. 347 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T