Patna High CourtCR. MISC./65610/2024bail rejected

Gohal Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2024-10-01Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 65610 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2021 Thana- MANSI District- Khagaria ====================================================== Gohal Yadav Son of Hafo Yadav Resident of Village -Saidpur Ward No.2, P.SMansi, District- Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vivekanand Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satyendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-10-2024 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Mansi P.S.Case No.05/2021 for the offences punishable under Sections 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. As per the allegation made in the FIR, all the accused persons including the petitioner fired on the informant, causing bullet injury on his right hand and the specific allegation against the petitioner is that he fired on the head of the informant but the bullet passed touching the ears of the informant.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case due to village politics.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 65610 of 2024(2) dt.01-10-2024 2/2

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for grant of regular bail to the petitioner.

5. Having considered the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, there is direct allegation against the petitioner that he had fired with an intention to kill the informant but the bullet passed touching the ears of the informant and the life of the informant could be luckily saved. The petitioner has criminal antecedent. As such, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

6. The present bail application is accordingly rejected. (Purnendu Singh, J) chn/- U