Kamlesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No 12496 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -80 Year- 2016 Thana -TARARI District- BHOJPUR ====================================================== Kamlesh Kumar Son of Late Jagsuhagan Singh, Resident of Village- Barka Gaon, Police Station- Tarari, District- Bhojpur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : M/s Anil Kr & Rajeev Ranjan, Advocates For the S t a t e : Mri Shyam Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-03-2017 Heard the parties.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Tarari Police Station Case No 80 of 2016 registered for offences punishable under Sections 188, 353, 504, 506, 427 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that allegation against him is that on search, it was found that he had not maintained the stock register and there is further allegation that he had torn the report prepared by the informant. It is further submitted that he had been implicated in this case at the instance of the local leader of the Ruling Party and there is no complaint of any consumer with regard to the conduct of the petitioner. Heard learned APP also.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12496 of 2017 (2) dt.27-03-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, however, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks and make prayer for regular bail, which will be considered by the learned Court below, if possible on the same day, taking into consideration the submission of the learned counsel that the petitioner has been falsely implicated at the instance of the local leader and further there is no complaint of any consumer against him as well as other materials available on record without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is disposed of.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) M.E.H./- U T