Patna High CourtL.P.A/48/2018dismissed

Ravindra Kishor v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-07-11Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.48 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7923 of 2010 ====================================================== Ravindra Kishor, Son of Shri Madan Prasad, 26, Gokul Marg, North S.K. Puri, P.S.- S.K. Puri, Patna- 800013.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Principal Secretary, Department of Personal and Administrative Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Bihar Staff Selection Selection Commission, Post- Veterinary College, Patna-14.

5. The Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Selection Commission, Post- Veterinary College, Patna-14.

6. The Controller of Examination, Bihar Staff Selection Selection Commission, Post- Veterinary College, Patna-14.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Ratnesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. S.K. Sharma, AC to AAG-3 For the Commission : Mr. S. S. Sundaram, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 11-07-2018 Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we find that even though the petitioner did produce the caste certificate issued by the District Magistrate, as is canvassed before us, but after the interview was held on 17.7.2006, the caste certificate itself was produced for the first time after an inordinate period of time i.e. on 1.3.2011 during which period the selection process,

Patna High Court LPA No.48 of 2018 dt.11-07-2018 2/2 which was initiated in the year 2005, had already been completed.

Taking note of all these factors, the learned Writ Court has rejected the writ application. In doing so, we are of the considered view, the learned Writ Court has not committed any error warranting re-consideration.

The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) ( Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) K.C.Jha/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 17.07.2018 Transmission Date N/A