← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/12617/2016disposed

Chandeshwar Prasad v. The Bihar State Power Holding Company Ltd. And ORS

2018-06-29Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12617 of 2016 =========================================================== Chandeshwar Prasad Son of Late Laxmi Kapar resident of Kishorinagar Talkhapur Man, Santinagar, Dumra Road, P.S. Dumra, District - Sitamarhi .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Bihar State Power Holding Company Ltd. through its Chairman - Cum - Managing Director, Vidyut Bhawan, Patna

2. The Chairman Cum Managing Director, Bihar State Power Holding Company Ltd. Vidyut Bhawan, Patna

3. The Managing Director, North Bihar Power Distribution Co. Ltd., Vidyut Bhawan, Patna

4. The General Manager - Cum - Chief Engineer ( HR ) North Bihar State Power Holding Co. Ltd., Vidyut Bhawan, Patna

5. The D.G.M. Cum Electrical Superintending Engineer, North Bihar Power Distribution Co. Ltd. Electric Supply Area, Tirhut ( Muzaffarpur )

6. The Accounts officer, Electric Supply Area, Tirhut, Muzaffarpur

7. The Assistant Electrical Engineer, Electric Supply Sub - Division, Ramnagar, West Champaran .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

For the BSPHCL : Mr. Ajay Kumar Gautam, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 29-06-2018 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited (hereinafter referred to as the 'Company') is present and has been

Patna High Court CWJC No.12617 of 2016 dt.29-06-2018 2/2 heard.

2. As per the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the Company, the admitted payments have been made.

3. There being no rejoinder to the same on behalf of the petitioner and further nobody having appeared on his behalf today and even on the earlier occasion, the Court can only presume that the admitted dues of the petitioner have been paid and, accordingly, he does not want to pursue the matter.

4. In view thereof, the writ petition stands disposed off. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) Anjani/- AFR/NAFR U