Vinod Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.338 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-188 Year-2021 Thana- KUTUMBA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== VINOD SINGH, S/o Sri Kedar Singh, R/o Village- Urdana, P.S.- Kutumba, District- Aurangabad, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Varun Kumar Trivedi, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 14-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Kutumba P.S. Case No. 188 of 2021 (G.R. No. 1647 of 2021) registered for the offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.

In view of the fact that prima facie a case under the Excise Act, is made out against the petitioner, this application for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is not maintainable in view of Full Bench decision of this Court rendered in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2019(2) P.L.J.R. 1089 (F.B.).

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.338 of 2022(2) dt.14-02-2022 2/2 Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not maintainable.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) pawan/- U T